Saddam never gassed his own people
FLASHBACK: Saddam never gassed his own people
Carlton Meyer
1 December 2003 - A Stephen C. Pelletiere commentary appeared in the January 31, 2003 New York Times, yet no one seems to have noticed. Here is part of what he wrote about frequent statements that Saddam Hussein gassed 5000 Kurds at Halabja in 1991:
...as the Central Intelligence Agency's senior political analyst on Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war, and as a professor at the Army War College from 1988 to 2000, I was privy to much of the classified material that flowed through Washington having to do with the Persian Gulf. In addition, I headed a 1991 Army investigation into how the Iraqis would fight a war against the United States; the classified version of the report went into great detail on the Halabja affair.
This much about the gassing at Halabja we undoubtedly know: it came about in the course of a battle between Iraqis and Iranians. Iraq used chemical weapons to try to kill Iranians who had seized the town, which is in northern Iraq not far from the Iranian border. The Kurdish civilians who died had the misfortune to be caught up in that exchange. But they were not Iraq's main target.
And the story gets murkier: immediately after the battle the United States Defense Intelligence Agency investigated and produced a classified report, which it circulated within the intelligence community on a need-to-know basis. That study asserted that it was Iranian gas that killed the Kurds, not Iraqi gas.
The agency did find that each side used gas against the other in the battle around Halabja. The condition of the dead Kurds' bodies, however, indicated they had been killed with a blood agent -- that is, a cyanide-based gas -- which Iran was known to use. The Iraqis, who are thought to have used mustard gas in the battle, are not known to have possessed blood agents at the time.
These facts have long been in the public domain but, extraordinarily, as often as the Halabja affair is cited, they are rarely mentioned. A much-discussed article in The New Yorker last March did not make reference to the Defense Intelligence Agency report or consider that Iranian gas might have killed the Kurds. On the rare occasions the report is brought up, there is usually speculation, with no proof, that it was skewed out of American political favoritism toward Iraq in its war against Iran.
I am not trying to rehabilitate the character of Saddam Hussein. He has much to answer for in the area of human rights abuses. But accusing him of gassing his own people at Halabja as an act of genocide is not correct, because as far as the information we have goes, all of the cases where gas was used involved battles. These were tragedies of war.
The Baathist regime did kill thousands of Kurds during fighting to suppress occasional uprisings by what Americans call gangs or terror groups. Iran, Turkey and Syria have also killed thousands of Kurds, and of course the USA has killed thousands of innocent Iraqis to maintain order, albeit unintentionally. A better example of a government leader using chemicals to "gas his own people" occurred in 1993 near Waco, Texas.
3 Comments:
Using poison gas, for whatevr reason, is not a "tragedy of war" - it's a WAR CRIME, by definition. This article, if correct and factual, claims that both Iran and Iraq committed war crimes at Halabja. It doesn't absolve Saddam, it implicates the Iranians and Saddam both.
10/16/2005 05:20:00 PM
TT - I have to hand it to you, when you raise a topic of conversation you do it with the finesse and flair of someone taking the cover off a dish at a dinner party to reveal a live hand grenade. I imagine you chuckling as you prepare each provocative morsel to amaze and entertain your guests!
There are things in this world that are so dangerous that imagining their use as weapons is madness. In my previous job controlling air pollution I consulted with people who had experience in designing equipment to treat the exhaust from a biological warfare laboratory in order to incinerate any germs that might otherwise escape, and I toured another laboratory where the paint was scrubbed from the walls to clean up and make the area safe after animal experiments on the effects of inhaling aerosols of plutonium or uranium.
The chemical weapons used by Saddam might be considered primitive by some people. There are worse things, I have heard, much worse. I consider the use of such things unreasonable and unacceptable regardless of the justification and regardless of who killed who.
10/17/2005 03:09:00 AM
"The agency did find that each side used gas against the other in the battle around Halabja. The condition of the dead Kurds' bodies, however, indicated they had been killed with a blood agent -- that is, a cyanide-based gas -- which Iran was known to use. The Iraqis, who are thought to have used mustard gas in the battle, are not known to have possessed blood agents at the time."
At the time of the gasing in Halabja the Iranians held the town. So this propagandist would have us believe that the Iranians gassed their own troops.
10/20/2005 10:06:00 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home